In our previous articles (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3), we have shown that the Social Contract that underpins the “democratic” politics of the liberal West is a pure invention, a fiction. Without this “Robinson-Crusoe” fable, it would have been impossible to even have individuals who just fell from the sky, creating themselves and society through their freedom—sovereign men who could ignore God, Who created Heaven and Earth, but also society through families. Only the West (with liberalism and its counterpart, communism) has lost its mind to the point of inventing such fables, and then claiming that they usher in the reign of reason and modernity with democracy, when both are pure folly and sheer hubris.
Indeed, imagining himself to be the creator of society, man thus becomes his own end and that of society; that is, material man, with his instincts and feelings, a man not made in the image of God but a man made in the image of man—what used to be called naturalism, rationalism, a humanism gone mad. Modern Western man has thus become this bizarre being who, while acting and thinking as if he were God, limits his ambitions to the relative and the material, without a good and a true objective that would constrain him, that would obligate him, ignoring, therefore, any order of creation that would refer to a Creator of heaven and earth, as well as Natural Law and all supernatural life. The man of the liberal fable is therefore not only the exact opposite of the Christian man, but also and above all that of the religious man, Muslim or Jew, and the opposite, too, of the Sage of the East or of antiquity.
Thus, political authority, respectful of cosmic harmony, obedient to God’s Law and thus reflecting the Divine Wisdom, from which human wisdom derives, is replaced by power for material gain. Ultimately, thus, the reason for society becomes greed, for it is greed that governs the so-called “humanist” society (humanism is inauthentic and depraved because it lacks God). The god of money is the new master and creator of all such things in the era of the so-called modern Enlightenment, a master for whom society as a whole must sacrifice itself, enslave itself, so that an extreme minority of the very rich can become even richer, and continue to manipulate society as a whole for their own benefit.
Moreover, the people constructed by the Social Contract, the people of democratic representation, are merely a manufactured people; the social contract ignores the real people, who still seek to live in a community of love and identity; that is, the family and the homeland; and not only does the political representation of the people ignore the real people, it seeks to destroy them. This people no longer exist by themselves and for themselves, as a creature made in the image of God, but they exist to serve the so-called “democratic” system, which has become the tyranny of a small messianic plutocratic minority.
The freedom of the individual in the Social Contract thus ends up in servitude to an extremely small plutocracy, who are the masters and creators of society, with the media and politicians they buy, thanks to the money they possess, who govern everything through their money. Liberal democracy, in its ultimate consequences as we know them today, is a fool’s game that ignores the Good of the real People, starting with the Good of man in God’s image for God, and all this by design.
In concrete terms, this plutocracy is destroying the family unit, which it ignores, even though it is the basis of true society. Since the Social Contract makes society, there cannot be a family. There cannot be two creators of society: either God, through the family of a man and a woman, or the individual, the new god, creating it through the Social Contract. The laws on divorce, abortion and euthanasia are logical consequences of the Social Contract fable.
We have also seen that liberalism, which denies the reality of the family, denies reality itself, and thus leads to nihilism. This nihilism is supremacist. It wants the new liberal “light” to illumine the rest of the world. Thus, it was with the France of the Enlightenment, during the French Revolution and Napoleon’s wars; with Great Britain, with its gunboat liberalism dominating the rest of the world through trade; and with the United States, which sees itself as the chosen nation, with a manifest destiny, for democracy and human rights. When American messianism, with the neo-conservatives, meets Jewish atheist messianism, with the policies of Mr. Kagan in the Middle East and his wife, Madame Nuland, in Europe, the modern “enlightened” project is at its height. It is atheist, racist, supremacist, secularist, satanic, and its messianic plan is to lead the world into Hell.
The new religion of the West is fundamentally individualistic, subjectivist, relativistic atheism, which states loud and clear: “God, You will not reign over us; we are our own law (through the fiction of the social contract); we are masters of life (abortion) and death (euthanasia); we define our sex by our feelings and our will; we define ‘modern’ families based on same-sex couples,” and so on.
Everything is reversed, inverted as Satan knows how to do, for he is the father of lies and those who refuse to believe him are declared guilty of blasphemy; they will be taken to court, persecuted and thrown into prison. It all makes sense. Hatred of God leads to Satanic religion with its inverted morality police.
Could there be any system more contrary not only to Christian values, but more abominable from a natural, human point of view, contrary to all religions and civilizations? No. We have reached the end of the liberal logic, which is finally revealing what it is, the fruits that the Catholic Church so lucidly announced.
If we want peace with Russia and peace in the world, if we want to avoid the nihilistic destruction of our planet, we must stop this war on human and social nature. This war is being waged on God by Satan, who is sowing disorder and death throughout the West and the world, with the war being waged on Russia because it is Christian, and on the Arab nations because they are Muslims.
We can bring this peace. This is the meaning of the Abu-Dhabi project that I present at the end of this article. First of all, by denouncing the nihilistic logical consequences of the fable of the liberal social contract, which claims to create society outside the family. Next, by showing, in contrast, the true society worldwide, born of the love of family, willed by God: “male and female, He created them to become one flesh” to “grow and multiply” according to God’s designs. Then we will understand the true meaning of the Motherland, the society built by our Fathers, handed down by our parents, and above all we will be able to rebuild, differently, the society of societies, the international society, according to the same principles of the family model and not those of the Social Contract.
In this way, international society will reflect the human family and not the fable of the Social Contract, in which each nation creates international society in the image of the individual, through a contract of nations creating international society, still without God, without Justice, without the Good, with only self-interest and greed and ideological delirium as motivation, as in the construction of liberal society. It is not the numbers of the majority that makes the True or the Good. This is true of domestic society, it is true of national society, and it is always true of international society.
By breaking with the liberal international construct, the present League of Nations, we will build the true Society of Nations. Then we will once again establish just international relations, based not on the interests of manipulated majorities, but on the realities of the human family, and we will once again achieve a true concert of nations.
But there can be no concert of nations without the harmony of the Good, of the True; this harmony can only be established in Justice and ultimately in Love, which is the true respect for others in their differences. Then we will have true international peace, born of justice in human relations, thanks to our ability to listen to each other’s differences—differences that are transformed into harmony through our submission to the common good of humanity, through our submission to the Creator of Heaven and Earth. Then the purulent canker of liberal ideology, born of the fable of the Social Contract, will disappear, not only from national society, but also from international society, for it will be drowned out by the Good and the True that we will express in our Love of God, who transcends us all.
We are now facing an eschatological moment; a moment of personal choice, but also of collective choice in terms of its consequences. Do we choose the Being who gave us Life, and from Whom everything proceeds, the God Creator of Heaven and Earth, present in all the great religions and wisdoms, as the source of our human relationships, personal and social, national and international, or do we choose this mad and destructive pride which makes us believe that we are gods, instead of God, with all the destructive consequences this has for human society, national and international, because it puts interest and greed through the social contract in the place of love in the family?
In the Christian West, we once worshipped a crucified God whose name is Jesus Christ, Son of God; Muslims themselves recognize Him as a great prophet; only the Jews do not recognize Him as the expected Messiah because, as a Jew, He was put to death in Jerusalem by their Sanhedrin. This Sanhedrin continued its atheistic messianism in different forms. They are still putting Christ to death.
All human beings are affected by this apocalypse of Western nothingness, which is the insane project that Satan has been pursuing since the beginning. If we are all brothers in humanity, having the same Father, we are also all in solidarity and responsible for one another. It is time to change.
First of all, we, the people of the West, since we have allowed the liberal beast to feed and rule us, while it destroys us and the rest of the world through its wars. We continue to play “the democratic game,” without really believing in it, because it is really becoming grotesque and burlesque. We need to abandon this fool’s game and rethink our political organization, abandoning the false principle that the majority makes the truth. We need to rethink politics from the point of view of families, the basic building blocks of society and the transmission of true values, like a father who knows that he has children with unequal talents and resources, who loves them all, does not set his children against each other—quite the contrary—but makes them all cooperate for the good of the family. This principle must inspire the new Western politics. In this way, true human solidarity in politics will extend from the family to the homeland, to the society of homelands, to international society in mutual charity, that is, in a just relationship of love, giving and sharing.
We must put an end to the idea that talent entitles one to enslave and exploit one’s fellow man, as is the case in our economic system, and take back into our families the education of our children, for no society has ever been so corrupted by such monstrous materialism, seeking to pervert young children, to turn them away from truth and beauty, from the virtue without which no society can be founded, to inoculate them with lies, vice and depravity through national education, even to mutilate them and strip them of all spirituality.
If we are to achieve these changes, we will need not only our own forces, but also the forces of the rest of the world, which is watching our self-destruction with mixed feelings. You, the rest of the world, do not say that if the West destroys itself, it does not concern you, and that perhaps you might even benefit from it. The destruction of the liberal West will also have consequences for you, and may well destroy you too. You cannot tell yourselves that by choosing the winner’s side you will not lose out, and that you are therefore safe from disaster.
You are now the majority in terms of population and your economic power surpasses ours, but you are by no means safe from the massive destruction of the West. The simple chaos of the West will, through global interdependence, lead to chaos in your countries. Even if you manage to protect yourselves from destruction and chaos, which I do not think you can, if you fail to learn the lessons of Western suicide, as you have been influenced by its destructive materialism—whether you like it or not, the same causes will produce the same effects in your nations, sooner or later.
So, you probably have no choice. It is in your vital interest to be an ally of all Western resistance fighters, an ally of all those who want to prevent this suicide, out of common interest but also for your own survival. For while it is probably impossible to prevent the end of the liberal West, we can certainly try, together, to mitigate the destructive and collateral damage; we can, together, try to build a fairer world because it is multipolar—a multipolar world that would not be a simple reaction to the unipolar West but a world of balance, listening to the legitimate interests of the powers to overcome them in a Common that is called the Common Good.
Everywhere in the world, we need to bring together respected wise men and women, to collectively resist the forces of mass destruction of evil. This dialogue of wisdoms in search of the truth, the possible future and the desirable future must be combined with a dialogue of religions, for man is naturally religious, and without God no human construction is possible.
Destructive events reveal the truth of things. We already know what we do not want: the hegemony of a power seeking to enslave the rest of the world and destroy humanity in the name of what it dares to call “good.” On this basis, we will build a real dialogue, and then try to understand how to avoid the worst. With the experience of the Western past and the present, which reveals the roots of evil, we will know how to build for the future the right balance of powers in an international society conceived as a true family, with the diversity of talents that make up the diversity of nations. Every talent is useful to the Community.
I hope that this gathering of intelligence and wisdom in Abu-Dhabi will act as a counterweight to the current forces of destruction and nothingness in the West. We will try to think and act without the pride that threatens us all, but does not allow us to listen to others. As we also know, the remedy for pride is self-sacrificing love, the love of a mother in a family, the human family. Thus, we will take our cue from Mary, that Blessed Mother. Only a mother’s love can prevail over self-interest, which is always opposed to another interest, because self-interest most often bears the name of greed, and greed brings with it war and the destruction of others.
We will learn to rethink justice in international relations and how to reconcile the national interest with the interest of other peoples and nations, as in a large family, because without justice there can be no peace, and we will also try to prevent the excessive concentration of money in a few hands, because money drives people mad and makes them believe they are gods. Money is a false god that demands to be worshipped instead of God. We will also be rethinking international economic relations, because capital is nothing but accumulated labor; it cannot have a life of its own outside the human beings it is meant to serve. Justice in Truth will dominate our relations, as in any family, and we will serve and prepare, as far as possible, and with God’s help, a world at peace.
This is the meaning of the Abu-Dhabi project: “Multipolarity for Peace,” presented below, which I propose to you as the conclusion of this fourth and final article in “Peace with Russia.” Time is running out. The moment of Truth is approaching.
Abu-Dhabi 2024-2025
There are many peace initiatives, but none that bring together geopolitical leaders from all the world’s major powers, former security and intelligence services, historians and economists, to analyze the real reasons behind past and present wars, as well as those brewing before our very eyes. We must, however, prevent apparent opposing interests, always present or to come, because they are part of the life of nations, from becoming conflictual by being instrumentalized to the point of mutual destruction.
It is true that we are moving towards a more multipolar world, but what does a multipolar world mean if it is only bipolar, block against block, the rest of the world against the so-called unipolar West, for example, as is currently taking shape? We can understand this multipolarity of reaction, but it does not build the multipolarity of balance of Powers. It is not a source of appeasement in international relations, but a source of conflict.
Indeed, this apparent multipolarity stirs up opposition between two groups, the West and the rest of the world—but an organized global minority will still be able to continue to play on oppositions, leading to chaos, to maintain its supremacy and continue to act with impunity. What is more, even if the West were destroyed or out of the picture, India would continue to oppose a powerful China, countries close to China would still seek to escape its sphere of influence, Russia would still have to seek to subsist, in the future, with the resources of a continent but a declining demography, the Arab world would have to seek protectors or, better still, build balances (which is what we are proposing) against the greed of surrounding Powers.
If we want peace, we need to build a balance between the Powers and listen to their divergent interests in order to establish a just Multipolarity. Further, it is absurd to single out the West. The West has forged this conflict-ridden World; and behind the West, a Western minority has cleverly taken control of the World, playing on the oppositions built up to its advantage; it could continue to do so in its desire to destroy everything that is not itself. Would it not be better to ally ourselves with the best Westerners who understand this history, and do not want this deadly pattern to be repeated endlessly until total destruction.
Objective
- Analyze current and past conflicts, with all their undercurrents, to understand the opposing interests on which conflicts and world wars have been grafted.
- Prevent, repair and overcome current conflicts in the apparent irreducible opposition of two or more camps, by revealing the real players who are instrumentalizing a war against a humanity that is not their own.
- Neutralize the real players who instrumentalize opposing interests in conflict by exposing them. This is just as true in the war against Russia as it is in the war in Palestine.
- Build true multipolarity, i.e., the balance of great powers for peace.
- Organize multipolarity institutionally, breaking with the unipolar world of Bretton Woods and the multipolarity of confrontation.
Means
- Focused forum of 10 people representing the major powers for ‘peace with Russia.
- Have the same reduced approach for peace in Palestine.
- Setting up a multipolar CFR in Abu-Dhabi, published monthly, on the views of the major powers and the possible balances proposed.
- Publications on the theme of multipolarity in the various languages of the multipolar world and global partnership with national publishing houses and alternative media.
- Annual World Peace Forum with historical, economic and media analysis of current conflicts.
- Establishment of a “Powers for Peace” master’s program in Abu-Dhabi, bringing together students from the major powers to reflect on international justice and implement it in their positions of responsibility.
Featured: Al-Idrisi World Map (12th century), by Sharif al-Din al-Idrisi (obit. 1165), commissioned by King Roger II (1097–1154).
