Read Part 1 and Part 3 of this essay.
The real reasons behind the war against Russia, and how to build a peaceful world.
Before describing a future multipolar world of peace with its balance of powers, we need to try and understand the reasons behind all the wars waged by the liberal West. We have two world wars to our credit, and we are preparing a third with the war against Russia: The West is preparing to commit suicide. What great purpose are we pursuing that justifies not only all these fratricidal internal wars, but also all our external wars against the rest of the world? Why must the world convert to our values?
Have we waged all our recent wars, since the year 2000, for the good of our own people and for democracy? Are these wars not contrary to the interests of our nations and people? All nations and people want to live and survive, but instead our “values” are leading us to decline, to destruction, into a nihilism that destroys not only us but others.
So, if we want peace with Russia, we must first find out whether there are just reasons or even interests that have led us into this war, as led us to all our internal and external wars. We hold such wars to be just, if they are in the interests of the people and nations, because a democratic policy cannot pursue other interests. If we cannot find just reasons, or if we can only find unjust, deceptive reasons or interests, then we need to ask what our liberal foundations are for, because of which we seek to bring light to the rest of the world, i.e., transforming humanity by making ourselves and the world “enlightened.” We need to know more about this liberal ideology that enjoins us to want to “enlighten” others with our “values,” which then lead to internal and external war, and then to our own destruction.
The Consequences of Breaking the Continental Axis
The break-up of the continental axis in Ukraine, in order to keep Europe momentarily in the American sphere—a sphere abandoned by German economic policy, given its economic dependence on Russia and China for the competitiveness of made-in-Germany products—led to a paradoxical situation, to say the least. It was foreseeable that Russia, as the Eurasian balancing power, would have to rely on China to face up to NATO which was now on its borders. Prior to the launch of the Special Military Operation, President Putin visited China. Was it not to warn this ally of a military reaction, now inescapable, to NATO’s advance with the concentration of Russian troops on Ukraine’s borders? This reaction was to be expected, following the Munich declaration of 2007. In Russia, what is said by the head of state is always followed by action, because the credibility of the state is at stake. That is how I interpreted it back then, and I warned my political friends of the impending intervention.
Why did US strategists, the Deep State, want NATO to advance to Russia’s borders? It does not seem to be in our interest, because if we think about the consequences of this advance, it could only mean the weakening of the West. In effect, this strategy forced Russia to ally itself with China in order to face up to the West. The West thereby lost a conservative, Christian ally at its very doorstep.
Why, then, when Russia, within its 1991 borders, has never been a threat to the United States, has been and still remains an ally for the conservative West, demanding only respect for its sovereignty and the identity of its populations outside its borders—why did the US wage war on Russia, indirectly via the Ukraine, when China was, is, and will be even more so in the future, the only real competitor to the United States, able to oppose Western hegemony; a communist country which seems even less liberal than Russia? . What was, what is, what remains, in the future, the interest of the United States in this war against Russia in the Ukraine and, more broadly, for us in the West? In particular, why is the United States dissipating its power on Russia against China, after having, moreover, hoisted China to the top of the economic league to turn it into its only real competitor, since, without the support of the United States, and its unjustified accession to the WTO, China could never have reached its current level of development? Why, moreover, strengthen China with this predictable Russia-China alliance? Is it solely for the benefit of a financial oligarchy? But while it is true that outsourcing to China to help it develop boosted the profits of Western companies and, through offshore profits, brought about the globalization of finance, this explanation is not enough to explain the incoherence of intelligent and readily patriotic strategists, such as Brzeziński, Albright, Nuland, and so on.
Further, thanks to the West—i.e., global exports, especially to the USA and the EU—China’s GDP in purchasing power parity terms now exceeds that of the USA. In the near future, China will be able to draw on an army superior to that of the United States, thanks to the industrial impoverishment of the latter, due precisely to US and European offshoring to China. Thus, China has become the world’s only real competitor to the United States, and may tomorrow become the sole hegemon behind its declared multipolarity, leading it to ally itself with the rest of the world against the West. At the end of the day, whatever those who imagine themselves building a fairer world with it may say, with today’s multipolarity, this multipolarity only serves the strongest in the alliance—just like in NATO. We have known the US Hegemon. So let us get to know the Chinese Hegemon of tomorrow, if we follow the current logic.
Why, then, if one is a true American patriot, should one also be a conservative, weakening the United States in a fight with Russia, which is not a danger, and giving an almost certain victory to China, with this China-Russia alliance that is unnatural for Russia in the first place? Russia is with the West against China, and only with China out of necessity—that is, if the West wages war against Russia. Eurasian Russia has always distrusted China, as I found out when I went to China to follow Dassault’s business, often passing through Moscow, to get to know China better through Russian eyes. Russia, with its Orthodox Christian culture and white population of 140 million, can hardly compete with China’s 1.3 billion people. It is not the European Union that poses a real threat to Russia in the long term, but China.
But first and foremost, in order to substantiate this thesis of Western suicide, due to the very logic of the liberal system, caught up in the divergent interests of the elite who follow liberal ideological “enlightenment” against the real Nation and People, I wish to show that the war waged on Russia was going to set in motion, rationally and therefore totally predictably, this Russia-China alliance, as well as a coalition of the rest of the World against this “liberal” West, thus putting an end to its world domination. Those who have unleashed this war in Ukraine are in fact working against the superior interests of the American state, against our people, and against the West as a whole. This is what we must now try to understand, by analyzing the very logic of the liberal system, which in its ideological foundations leads to such suicidal situations. In fact, if liberals have not seen the consequences of their policies coming, it is because their ideological motivation is beyond the common good of our nations. The logic of liberal ideology combines, as we shall see, with that of money, interest and greed, which have become the real driving forces behind the liberal system, with its fundamental hatred of the Christian West as the guardian of the natural order.
We cannot deal here with the sanctions against Russia and the confiscation of Russian assets, which function as a weapon of mass destruction against the whole of the West, but first and foremost against the United States, since these sanctions will ultimately remove the dollar’s dominance as the world’s international reserve currency that enabled the United States to spend lavishly in order to make up for its trade and payment deficit (brought on because of offshoring to China) with the rest of the world, but thereby also by controlling the world, through finance associated with the dollar. This subject is too vast on its own to be approached analytically, and is merely the consequence of the prideful logic of our “values,” which structure the West according to their own rationale, to the point where we are no longer even aware of reality and our true interests. However, this economic suicide rounds out my point that there is in the United States, in Europe, an ideological system with its deep state that always works, intrinsically, by its own logic, against US interests, against the American people, against our European peoples and nations, and always works against the values of truth, freedom, democracy and above all justice.
As for China, let us not forget that all the media, controlled by Western finance, put forward its “neutrality.” China was practically asked to plead our cause to the “Russian aggressor.” The French President went to China, for example, because it was important for “big” France to show “little” China its true interests. However, this neutrality was structurally (historically and ideologically) entirely impossible and unthinkable for reasons linked on the one hand to Western aggression in China for at least two centuries, to the return of the Chinese Nation, and on the other hand linked to Chinese interests—this war has come to accentuate Western attrition in an inescapable China-Western or China-US confrontation, with China intelligently trying to get Western Europe on its side, with our economic servility and the betrayal of our elites also advocating this.
Thus, the heads of the major investment funds that form the global elite of liberal logic and who control our companies through their investments, invited China to Davos to present the Great Reset of globalism, which the elite herald because it is liberal, and liberal because it is profitable to them and also to their vassal politicians. They sought to associate China with this globalism, which indeed benefited China, but to the detriment of our peoples and nations, and for a desired people of the world that awaited the elite’s “liberal” world government.
In practice, however, Western companies had become Chinese through legislation requiring a local partner. Xi Jinping and the Chinese leaders who preceded him pursued a policy independent of the West, using the West solely in their own country’s interests by channeling Western greed into Chinese economic development. China did not allow predatory capitalism to operate as it had in Russia under Yeltsin. China did not need to worry about a few Khodorkovsky-type billionaires who worked for the West, because its billionaires were already controlled by a Communist Party that controlled everything, both good or bad corruption and it uncovered the bad and imprisoned or even eliminated the black sheep. It is Chinese nationalism that is the real driving force behind Chinese economic development; the Nation is not at the service of global economic development, but global economic development must serve the Chinese Nation.
Western strategists who thought they could make China “liberal,” i.e., put it under the control of Western money, ignored, or rather pretended to ignore, China’s history. If we forget the Western gunboat diplomacy of the 19th century, the Chinese will never forget it. We Westerners opened the borders of this sovereign country to cannon fire so that Great Britain could sell its opium from India, destroying a large part of the Chinese population and humiliating the Chinese state for a single reason: our greed, our so-called liberal money. Could a Chinese forget, above all, the second Opium War, with the sacking of the Summer Palace by the French and the British? For a Chinese, Western greed is limited only by the balance of power previously imposed, and which now needs to be re-established or turned against the West, as it must serve China.
Moreover, Chinese “Communism” can only be understood in terms of Western practices of greed, for Communism and Socialism are Western ideological products; ideologically, they are merely the flip side of “liberalism” and the greed for money that is supposed to structure society. On the one hand, we have greed, i.e., liberal money that structures and organizes society to the detriment of people and democratic freedom; on the other, in reaction, you have the communist state and its ruling party, which defines the good as opposed to the democratic state and the freedom of the people.
You do not need to be a rocket scientist to know that for a Chinese, the Americans and NATO had no business being on Russia’s border in the Ukraine, because they were not on the USA’s border with a Chinese coalition in Mexico—whereas, and above all, the USA was already on China’s border in Taiwan, an indisputably Chinese province; the question of democratic self-determination being another matter entirely.
To imagine, therefore, that China would align itself behind a Western policy that it had suffered through, in its history, to the point of losing all sovereignty, showed a lack of analysis and gross errors not made by the many serious analysts of reality in the United States, even within the CIA so decried for being controlled, in part only, by the liberal Deep State.
China knew that, sooner or later, it would be subject to a balance of power with the West, and it knew this because of the relationship it had historically suffered for almost two centuries. It had prepared itself intelligently so that it no longer feared the West, but tried to remain the master of the schedule, i.e., of the opportunities and contradictions of the materialistic and greedy West, in order to rebuild itself, on the basis of this inescapable reality, with market forces, but also using them for its own national ends: for the independence and sovereignty of the country.
Above all, let me repeat, the war waged against Russia by the United States is seen by China as a real opportunity—it would weaken the whole of the West; it would weaken Russia too; and in the end, perhaps only China would be left and dominate the world: China, rediscovering its place in history, that of a great Nation and a great People, thanks to its independence and sovereignty, both placed at the service of the interests of the Nation. China was not going to sacrifice its interests to please the liberal West, which had always sought to destroy it, but from which it had managed to benefit its national development policy.
It was also foreseeable that this continental break-up, fomented by the United States, would lead to a coalition of the rest of the world against them and us, their European henchmen, i.e., against the whole of the West.
Indeed, the Vietnam War had already cast doubt on the Western camp of freedom. The superiority of napalm in converting nationalists-turned-communists to liberal values, in reaction to our greedy imperialism, was not obvious. Then came the ideology of the neo-conservatives, in the 2000s, with Bush Jr., and the use of the weapons-of-massive-destruction lies in Iraq, via Libya, to Syria, not forgetting Afghanistan, which had to be freed from the Taliban which we had put in place—all these wars were for the West the real weapons of mass destruction of the West brought about because of massive lies.
This global coalition against the West was going to coagulate in the Ukraine with Gaza, with absolute certainty, as I told Catherine Belton of the Washington Post at the time, at my home.
Indeed, the massacres of civilian populations in order to eliminate terrorists will only multiply these terrorists, and create a fierce hatred between the Arab populations and Israel, and Arab states will have to follow their populations, lest they be overthrown, thus jeopardizing Israel’s very existence due to the actions of a Western liberal political elite working against the true interests of the State of Israel, but first and foremost against those who support Israel, which is responsible for these massacres. Our unconditional support for Israel, which obeys none of the United Nations’ resolutions and from which Israel derives its existence and legitimacy as a state, shows the world our hypocrisy and double standards. Henceforth, the Court of Justice we have used against Putin shows above all the illegal occupation of the territories we have taken, the occupation of Gaza and the West Bank, and the way Israel wants to render obsolete the two-state solution, without which there is no right founded in Justice. October 7th brought all our contradictions out into the open. It is the culmination of the massive destruction of the West and the rest of the world against the West.
Thus, for the rest of the world, the “liberal” West has become “illiberal,” if the term “liberal” still evokes anything positive, and the conflict with the liberal West goes beyond an economic component of supremacy and extends to an eschatological problem—the fight against the Great Western Satan: the liberal West is becoming a purulent canker, an existential threat to all humanity through its wars, especially if we include Operation Covid, led by the West and not by China, since it was Fauci who was experimenting in China with the coronavirus strains; and without Operation Covid, Trump would have remained President of the United States for a second term! The U.S. Supreme Court has, at last, recognized what we all knew—that the vaccines made compulsory by Covid-19 were not vaccines; that the damage caused by mRNA gene therapies is irreparable.
These operations orchestrated by the West, suicidal for us but also against all Peoples and States, seeking, moreover, to put the World under control for the benefit of the greed of our laboratories through the “liberal” logic of money but also with a view to avowed eugenics, at least if we listen to Davos—are becoming a threat to the survival of all humanity and are being experienced as such by the rest of the world.
We have to foresee the consequences of our actions, and they were totally foreseeable for any patriotic analyst—the War in Ukraine strengthens China and sets the entire rest of the World against us, the liberal West having become an existential threat to the rest of the World which is not part of it—we must then ask ourselves why, by whom, for what nihilistic and destructive ideology within the West itself this war against Russia has been waged against our peoples, our Nations and the whole of the West.
Undoubtedly, the real patriotic reasons for the war were the break-up of the continental axis mentioned in my previous article—this Berlin-Moscow-Beijing axis ultimately favored China, and perhaps in the long term risked turning Europe into a Chinese-Asian colony. But, let me repeat, if the rupture of this axis led to a de facto strengthening of China, why not immediately foresee the coup d’après: reintegrate Russia, making a rapid peace, leaving Russia the provinces that have always belonged to it, while ensuring, nevertheless, that Western Europe remains for a long time under the dependence of the United States in the face of the programmed “evil” Russia? Even this outcome is far from certain, as liberal, materialistic Europe remains ready to give itself to the highest bidder, and therefore to China, forgetting the United States.
We can therefore only understand this Western suicide by trying to reflect on the foundations of the liberal world whose consequences we now see—this West which was constituted against the Christian West? We will then understand that they quite logically engender this suicide while we begin by pretending to be surprised by it!
Therefore, we can only understand this Western suicide by trying to reflect on the foundations of the liberal world whose consequences we are now seeing—this West that was built up against the Christian West. Then will we understand that these foundations logically give rise to this suicide, though we pretend to be astonished by it.
Making peace immediately after this rupture of the continental axis in the Ukraine is what Boris Johnson, mandated by who knows whom, certainly not by himself, hastened to prevent. He told Zelenski that he had to go on with the war, because the West would always be on his side, no matter what—if we are to believe certain testimonies—which was far from being the case at the time, no less today, and still less in the future, thanks to the undermining of all Western interests by this liberal logic, against the interests of our states and peoples, as shown above.
This forces us to go to the very end of Western liberal logic, in an even more impertinent way. How could the United States, and the whole of the West, and via our politicians embodying the “liberal” and “democratic” state, have conceived of a victory against Russia—when this war would trigger, if we win against Russia, a nuclear war that would destroy the whole of the West, and if we lose against Russia, a triggering, then by the West, of the same apocalypse leading to our nihilistic destruction? Russia did not, however, declare war on us, unless one considers that by just being what it is, i.e., conservative and Christian, it is a declaration of war for the “enlightened” of “liberalism.” We must therefore identify the ideological logic that seeks to pursue such a destructive design, leading to the logic of the Bunker. Hitler would have wanted to destroy all the German people unworthy of his great project, had he had the nuclear bomb—which our leaders have.
Are we not completely caught up in this diabolical logic? For this desire to destroy the West is not expressed by our peoples, nor by the American people, much less by its conservative elite. For if America is to be “made great again,” that means it is no longer great. Under these conditions, to want to take on Russia + China + the Arab world, without seeing any benefit for the whole of the West, apart from our weakening and colossal debt, and to want, in the end, to take on the whole of the rest of the World (because this rest can no longer stand such a conquering, unjust and profoundly destructive West) in a war that will ultimately lead to nuclear war, while imagining, moreover, that we will win—is not that an insane choice? Are we not at the very heart of high treason of the Deep State or the Blob, but which is also high treason of the internal logic of liberalism, with all our politicians committed to this path, and therefore seeking the destruction of our peoples and even of humanity for these “liberal values?”
If the liberal interests of the Deep State are contrary to the interests of the United States and the American people, and lead to our programmed destruction, it is because they are, in the final analysis, subservient to these ideological, non-democratic powers, which pursue other ends. If the West is suicidal, always working against its interests, and those of our Nations and those of its peoples, then it is not democratically that it is doing so, but driven by its liberal ideological causes against democratic politics, which will always remain the survival or simply the good of the people.
If we do not identify these reasons for the massive and suicidal destruction of the West, any peace will be impossible, as it would only be the result of a momentary balance of powers, and the West will continue to destroy itself and the world. We need to decipher this logic in liberalism itself, which follows its own interests, driven by its own ideology, against the interests of nations and peoples. Since 9/11, the liberal machine has run amok, while neither the American people nor our European counterparts have ever really been consulted in all these wars that are unfolding before our very eyes, and which, whether we like it or not, are destroying us and, ultimately, all humanity.
This analysis is essential if we want peace, and if we want peace with Russia—for peace results first from Truth, then from the Freedom of the People, for only free People can build democratic Nations at peace with one another. Only Truth makes People free in democratic Nations, establishing internal and external Justice, a factor of peace, because without Justice there is no peace.
Furthermore, if these wars and the war in the Ukraine are motivated by any logic other than the interests of our Western and American people, then they are not based on rational arguments relating to the common good of our States and Peoples, much less on the so-called “democratic values” invoked by the West. We therefore need to abandon a rational analysis of interests for the common good in order to understand the overarching ideology, which takes precedence over all other goods and is served by those who are ready to sacrifice their country and their people because they consider themselves to be part of another, more elitist, more “enlightened” universal people, acting in fact to destroy the real people for the satisfaction of this “enlightened” people.
Read Part 1 and Part 3 of this essay.
Featured: Allegory of Russia, by Philipp Veit; painted ca. 1840s.
