As his nation faces a disastrous war that has cost hundreds of thousands of lives, Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky has been winning hearts and support from Western leaders and “mainstream” media. Indeed, few other figures in world’s history have ever received better treatment. As stated by a sympathetic political commentator in The New Statesman,
Western commentators compare him to legendary figures of the past. So appealing is he, and so insistent is his call for military intervention, that some of these commentators even seem ready to risk global war to support him. He is the essence of charisma.
The worshipful treatment of Zelensky is truly mindboggling. The Ukrainian people “have a leader worthy of their bravery and resilience,” writes U.S. President Joe Biden in a piece for Time Magazine. According to Biden, “Zelensky left his mark on history and provided to the world that Ukraine will long endure and its people will ultimately realize the democratic future they have long desired.”
Back in February 2022, Ukrainian author Andriy Kurkov linked Zelensky to James Bond when he turned down offers to a peace agreement and championed the country’s war with Russia. He has been hailed by singer song-writer Five for Fighting as the “Ukrainian Superman.” One of his songs is entitled, “Can One Man Save the World?” Bernard-Henry Lévy, a “French public intellectual” who boasts intimacy with Zelensky, claims that “[t]he free world, which is also at stake in the battle for Kyiv, and the European principles have found a new, young and magnificent founding father.”
This worshipful backing of the Ukrainian president is one of the reasons as to why he has been unwilling to negotiate a peace agreement with Russia. These narratives deliberately provoke on Western minds the thought that the Ukrainian leader is a brave democratic leader fighting against an external aggressor. Never mind that the five-year term of President Zelensky has expired on May 20, 2024. War coupled with Western support and popularity has kept him in power despite his term expiring.
Although it might be difficult to hold presidential elections during martial law, the Ukrainian Constitution does not ban holding elections while such law is in place. All the Constitution says is that presidential terms must last five years (Article 103). Ukrainian lawyers point out that the absence of a mechanism for extending a president’s term is a “deliberate omission” aimed at reducing the risk of abuse of power.
Ukraine became independent from Russia when the former Soviet Union collapsed, in 1991. When this happened, the Russian language was commonly used in the more urbanised and industrialised regions of south-eastern Ukraine. At that time, a very large group of Russian-speaking Ukrainians identified themselves as Ukrainians but used the Russian language at home, with their family and friends, and, if it was possible, in education, work, and interactions with the government (Ishchenko, p. xvii). In 2016, polls revealed that 51 per cent of Ukrainians still agreed that Russians and Ukrainians were “brotherly people.”
In today’s Ukraine, however, nothing can be Russian anymore. Names and monuments honouring the works of classical Russian poets have been erased from Ukrainian streets (Ishchenko, p. xix). Over the years the Ukrainian intelligentsia has advanced an agenda that seeks to associate everything backward with everything that is Russian. Ukraine must be seen as Western-oriented, fluent in English, stylish, liberal, and successful. Everything Russian, as such, is deemed old, conservative, provincial, in bad taste, losers. For the Ukrainian ruling class, the fulfilment of their nation’s modernity requires Ukraine to be feminist, liberal, “progressive” and definitely not Orthodox Christian. More about this later.
Viktor Yanukovych was the fourth president of Ukraine, serving from 2010 to 2014. His downfall was triggered by his announcement, in November 2013, that he would suspend negotiations on an association agreement with the European Union (EU). That month, a wave of protests known as Euromaidan began on Kiev’s Maidan Square just like the “Orange Revolution” in 2004. Yanukovych was eventually removed from power by a coup in 2014. According to Volodymyr Ishchenko, a researcher at the Freie Universität in Berlin, who was born in Ukraine and has taught sociology at Kyiv universities,
Yanukovych fled the capital on the evening of 21 February in the futile hope of falling back on the support of elites in south-eastern Ukraine, while the opposition took power in Kiev claiming dereliction of duty by the president. An interim government of the oligarchic opposition parties, including radical nationalists from the Svoboda party, took office. The US and EU approved the change of government, though it wasn’t in accord with the recently signed transition agreement. The incoming prime minister, Arseniy Yatsenyuk, a former banker, signed the political provisions of the EU association Agreement on 21 March (Ishchenko, p. 6).
The Euromaidan “revolution” was an armed uprising that responded to sporadic government violence with a violence of its own. It brought a pro-Western government to power in Kiev. The overall result was a shift in the balance of power between competing local oligarchies. Euromaidan did not bring transformation in favour of the common people; it only increased social inequality by allowing pro-Western oligarchs to seize the opportunity to advance their own interests and agendas. These oligarchs envisaged, inter alia, the exclusion of Ukrainians who desired to retain their native Russian language in the public square and who preferred friendly relations with Russia. Ishchenko then asks rhetorically:
What sort of reaction was to be expected from the people of the south-eastern regions, who had voted for Yanukovych and did not support the EU Agreement or the protests? These people were frightened by Maidan’s violence and by the first moves of the Yatsenyuk government against the status of the Russian language (Ishchenko, p. 32).
In the beginning, Euromaidan was a movement of middle-class Kievans and students driven by a European ideology. These privileged group of individuals were a vocal minority who wanted full integration into the European Union (EU). Their agenda reflected the interests of the professional middle class and those who were integrated into EU markets primarily as migrant workers (Ishchenko, p. xxi). Such “revolution” of the ruling classes never obtained support of the people, especially the eastern and southern regions. To the contrary, supporters of anti-Euromaidan were far more popular than those Maidan protesters who were hoping for the “European Dream” (Ishchenko, p. 14).
Whereas support for Euromaidan was heavily concentrated in the country’s western and central regions, Ukrainians living in the east and the south overwhelmingly disapproved the movement (Ishchenko, p. 9). After Euromaidan succeeded in unconstitutionally toppling the elected government, many people were scared and outraged by the pictures they saw on television of violent clashes in Kiev, including armed paramilitary groups controlling the streets. As a consequence, there were massive anti-Euromaidan rallies in the east—Kharkov, Donetsk, Lugansk, Dnepropetrovsk. After Yanukovych was toppled, these street mobilisations became even more intense—especially with Russia’s intervention in Crimea—and acquired a grassroots dimension. According to Ishchenko,
The anti-Maidan protests in eastern Ukraine were grassroots, decentralized, network-type and leaderless. Equally, they did not trust the oligarchic elite of eastern Ukrainian origins. The social base of the protest seems to be more plebeian, poorer, and less educated than that or the Maiden; we see more workers and pensioners and no so many intellectuals and highly educated professions who would help to formulate clear demands and defend them in the media (Ishchenko, pp. 14-15).
Since the beginning of Euromaidan in late 2013, there was a growing feeling that things were just getting worse. The pro-Russian segment of the Ukrainian population was brutally repressed and marginalised. As one Ukrainian politician candidly stated: “Good Russians do not exist” (Ishchenko, p. 112). So, when Russians troops crossed the border to protect the oppressed Russian-speaking majority in the east, pro-Western oligarchs understood that this was the perfect opportunity for a more “radical, uncompromising transformation of the whole country in their image and likeness on a scale that was impossible before: the war helps to silence the voices of discontent” (Ishchenko, p. xxvii). Their ultimate goal, writes Ishchenko,
is the eradication of anything related to Russia from the Ukrainian public sphere, including the removal of Russian-language books from libraries, the ban on teaching Russian in schools, even in the predominantly Russian-speaking cities like Odessa, and even a ridiculously obscurantist attempt (which passed the first reading in the Ukrainian parliament) to ban the citation of Russian and Russian-language sources in science and education. Add to this the banning of political parties, including some of Ukraine’s oldest… which have represented the ‘Eastern’ camp for decades, and further repression of popular opposition media and bloggers stigmatized as “pro-Russian,” even when they expressed no sympathy for the invasion (Ishchenko, p. xxviii).
The political benefits of Euromaidan were soon appropriated by Petro Poroshenko, the Ukrainian billionaire owner of the Roshen confectionery business. One of the leading voices of Euromaidan, Poroshenko made his fortune privatising Soviet confectionary factories in the wild 1990s. Unsurprisingly, the May 25, 2014 presidential election was won by him. One of Poroshenko’s first measures as president was to amend the Ukrainian Constitution to declare that the nation’s “strategic course” was full membership of NATO and the EU, thus overriding the Ukraine’s previous tradition of non-alignment.
The government of Poroshenko became notorious for its unashamed corruption as well as the unending war in Donbass and aggressive initiatives in policies stretching from language to public history. His government’s main goal was to fight “Russian imperialism,” although it was very keen to attend to Western imperialist interests. Between 2014—2019, it embraced an extreme pro-Western and nationalist agenda. His main slogan was “Army. Language. Faith.” Poroshenko adopted the rallying cry “Either me, or Putin” (Ishchenko, p. 37).
In 2019, Poroshenko managed to inscribe “Euro-Atlantic integration” into the Ukrainian Constitution. While this change was apparently legal, “it was hardly legitimate as Ukrainians were rather split on NATO at the time and the parties that pushed for it were polling dismally in terms of public support” (Ishchenko, p. 70). As Ishchenko points out,
Consulting the electorate was out of question. On the eve of the April 2008 Bucharest Summit, at which it was declared that Ukraine and Georgia ‘will become members of NATO’, fewer than 20 per cent of Ukrainian citizens aspired to do so. The rest were spilt between those who refereed an alliance with Russia and those attached to the non-aligned status quo. In late May and early June the previous year, the joint Ukraine-NATO ‘Sea Breeze’ naval exercise in Crimea had encouraged significant protest, as locals greeted disembarking US Marines with cries of “No to NATO in Ukraine!” (Ishchenko, p. 88).
Interestingly enough, the post-Euromaidan period also allowed neo-Nazi leaders to be elected to Parliament. One of these leaders, Adriy Biletsky, the head of the Patriot of Ukraine Party, was involved in forming the neo-Nazi Azov Battalion, which uses Nazi symbolism. Biletsky was eventually assigned to the rank of lieutenant in the Ukrainian police. In October 2014, Vadym Troyan, deputy commander of the Azov Battalion, was also elected to Parliament and appointed as the head of the police in the Kiev Oblast, a province in central Ukraine. Another politician, Yuriy Mykhalchyshyn, who promoted Joseph Göbbels’s Little ABC of National Socialism and the NSDAP 25-point Programme, was appointed to lead the nation’s Security Service (Ishchenko, p. 88).
In February 2014, Russia decided to invade the Crimean Peninsula. Support in Ukraine for NATO then increased, although this has never been embraced by a majority of Ukrainians. In December 2018, Poroshenko pushed through martial law across half of Ukraine’s regions. Since there was evidence of an escalating threat from Russia, such a prospect was used as a pretext for delaying election and win some time for the beleaguered president. Despite pro-democratic rhetoric, Poroshenko demonstrated remarkable authoritarian tendencies. According to Ishchenko,
Opposition politicians, media, journalists and bloggers suffered state repression and radical nationalist violence. This stretched as far as pogroms, arson attacks, imprisonment of opponents and fabricated criminal cases. So bad was the situation that the editor of the opposition’s main online publication, Strana-ua, had to get political asylum in Austria. At the same time, a paid army of pro-Poroshenko trolls produced a toxic atmosphere intolerant of dissent. A number of university lecturers were fired or arrested for their political positions and forced to leave the country (Ishchenko, p. 39).
During the pre-election presidential debates, Volodymyr Zelensky described himself as “the result of [Poroshenko’s] mistakes” (Ishchenko, p. 39). One can only image how poorly Ukrainians valued Poroshenko’s “achievements” to have elected him (Ishchenko, p. 39). Zelensky won the presidential election because he appeared to stand for everything the unpopular incumbent symbolised. The 2021 election that brought Zelensky to power was not the result of the strength of Ukrainian democracy but of Western dependency and oligarchic control.
When Zelensky got elected he had neither programme nor party but simply adopted the name of his television show, Servant of the People. As a candidate, he was supported by the oligarch Ihor Kolomoiskyi and his popular TV channel. Kolomoiskyi has shifted billions of dollars from Ukraine to offshore funds.
As a candidate, Zelensky spoke in favour of legalising drugs and sex work, and against restricting abortions. He called the late fascist leader, Stepan Bandera, “an undeniable hero,” although in the southern and eastern parts of Ukraine the vast majority of the population think of Bandera as a Nazi collaborator.
The current government of Zelensky is responsible for repression, censorship and discriminatory measures. His government is known for shutting down the media, for arresting political opponents, for the assassination of journalists, and for banning the Russian language in education for Russian speakers, which violates the rights of Russian speakers who comprise half of the Ukrainian population.
However, Zelensky has skillfully allured the Ukrainian people to commit national suicide with false promises of grandiose achievements in his pursuit of prolonging the war. This is especially tragic because, as noted by Ted Snider, a regular columnist on U.S. foreign policy at The Libertarian Institute,
The war has escalated into a nightmare for the people of Ukraine. Hundreds of thousands of their soldiers have been killed or wounded, infrastructure and environment have been devasted. Ukraine’s chances of achieving any of its hope or goals are decreasing and more land is being lost every day (Snider).
Zelensky was born to Jewish parents in the Ukrainian city of Rkyvyi Rih. He earned a Bachelor of Laws from the Kryvyi Rih Institute of Economics but did not practice law, preferring instead to make a career as a comedian. In the 2019 election, Zelensky was the most unlikely candidate to win that election. And yet, he won that election in a landslide in great part due to his promise to establish peaceful relations with Russia.
Prior to this, the comedian turned politician created his own political satire, Servant of the People, a television series that introduces Zelensky in the character of a teacher who unexpectedly becomes president. It was his work in this political satire “that was something of a road map for his rise to the presidency.” Once installed as president, writes Ishchenko,
Zelenskyi did not reverse the exclusionary nationalist drift of Poroshenko’s rule, despite the expectations of a large part of his voters. Zelenskyi’s civic nationalism remained shallow, paying lip service to diversity in the place of meaningful action. Beginning in 2021, the president increasingly targeted political opponents with threats and sanctions, went after their financial backers and banned most of the major opposition media. Squawks of disapproval from human rights organizations aside, those measures elicited no significant reaction from “the West”… Few observers questioned the idea that persecution of so-called pro-Russian forces was inevitable and even legitimate in a country under the foreign threat. Few still considered whether depriving a large segment of the population of political and public representation made Ukraine weaker, rather than stronger, vis-à-vis Russia (Ishchenko, p. 91).
Zelensky is heavily associated with some of the most powerful and notorious global oligarchs. Support for him comes directly from George Soros, Klaus Schwab, and numerous other oligarchs. Curiously, Klaus Schwab has even bragged about helping to elect him.
When Zelensky was elected, he hailed Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, another of Schawb’s pupils, as “one of those leaders who inspired him to join politics.” And yet, “Trudeau is not a leader, but merely a narcissistic tyrant,” writes Canadian political commentator Gord Magill, writing for Newsweek. Under Trudeau, the Canadian government arbitrarily “froze the bank accounts of truckers, seized donated funds, and shut down the economic lives of hundreds of Canadian citizens, a draconian measure that shocked the world.”
Indeed, a Canadian High Court has recently proven this. On January 23, 2024, the Federal Court of Canada ruled that Trudeau’s invocation of the Emergencies Act in 2022, used to crush the truckers’ Free Convey—”the largest and most peaceful protest in Canadian history”—was “unreasonable,” “unjustified,” and “violated the fundamental freedoms” set out in the Canadian Constitution. Federal Court Justice Richard Mosley expressed the following view:
There was no justification for granting the government powers that amounted to near martial law over a protest that was 100 percent peaceful, with no violence or property damage committed – that is, until the Emergencies Act was passed, and the police trampled grandmothers under horses, fired tear gas canisters at journalists within point blank range, beat protesters down and smashed the windows of the truckers rigs, and generally deployed the type of violence that the government had knowingly falsely accused the truckers of engaging in (Magill).
Like Trudeau, Zelensky is an acolyte of Schwab’s World Economic Forum (WEF), the globalist organisation behind the “Great Reset.” The WEF was one of the driving forces in the world after Covid. In July 2020, Schwab co-authored and published a book entitled, COVID-19: The Great Reset. With this publication, he sought to identify the weaknesses of the present economic system which, according to him, were exposed by the alleged pandemic. Schwab deemed Covid a “rare but narrow window of opportunity” to reset the global economy. “COVID-19 restrictions and measures to tackle climate change are pillars of the Great Reset initiative aimed to remake global capitalism, leading ultimately to tyrannical control over societies,” says climate journalist Marc Morano.
According to Dr Joseph Mercola, an osteopathic physician and recipient of multiple awards in the field of natural health, “the end goal of the Great Reset-pushing elitists is to own everything and control the entire global population through a combination of false flag disasters, social engineering technologies, ‘green’ and ‘sustainable’ development policies, a revamped food system of their own making, and global security measures.” In what is perhaps even more disturbing, the Great Reset also involves genetically modifying human beings. As noted by political economist and financial journalist James Gorrie,
Schwab’s WEF cohort is professor and author Yuval Noah Harari, who has publicly declared that free will in human beings is “over” and that humans are just “hackable animals” to be controlled by digital or nanochip implants. According to Schwab, under the Forth Industrial Revolution, humans will be genetically altered and chipped in the fusion of digital technology and human beings (Gorrie).
Ukraine is identified as one of the most corrupt countries in the world, certainly the most corrupt country in Europe. The country has acquired the unenviable reputation of having become the world’s most notorious money laundering nations. Zelensky himself presides over a notoriously corrupt regime. His government is known for shutting down the media and the assassination of independent journalists, for arresting political opponents and church leaders, and for banning the Russian language in education. Journalist Leon Kushner, a Jew who was raised by Holocaust survivors from Ukraine and who regularly contributes to The Jerusalem Post, comments:
Ukraine is not a democracy and never has been. It is as corrupt as Russia or perhaps more so. Definitely more antisemitic. Since 2014, Ukraine has become the world’s most popular money laundering state. Oligarchs run it mob style and chose the then actor Zelensky to be their presidential puppet. The WEF’s Klaus Schwab bragged about helping elect him and his equivalent Canadian puppet Trudeau. Just about every rich and famous player has been to Ukraine. And came back with even more money. From Bill Gates to Joe Biden, from George Soros to the Clintons. They all know that Ukraine is open for business.
Zelensky is as Jewish as Bernie Sanders or George Soros. Technically he was born Jewish but that’s where it ends. He left his Judaism by the road side years ago. He is no real friend to Israel and tolerates the neo-Nazis in his own government quite well. He does what his masters tell him to do and say. He has probably been paid off by Soros who is loving all of us Western nations, spending billions to prop up this corrupt state and leader. Do you recall their capitulation to then VP Biden to fire their prosecutor who was looking at the fraud committed by the Burisma corporation who had Hunter Biden as a board member? They wanted the billions of US dollars from the Obama administration and would do anything for the money (Kushner).
Zelensky, like the notorious billionaire oligarch George Soros, is a nominal Jew. Prior to Ukraine’s invasion, in February 2020, he told the media that he had an “ordinary Jewish upbringing.” Since Russia’s invasion Zelensky has made explicit references to his Jewish faith in stirring social media posts to galvanise international support for his government. With online posts in Hebrew and appeals to Jews to “cry out” in response to Russia’s invasion, Zelensky invoked his faith to rally support for his embattled country. Interestingly enough, his alleged faith did not prevent his government from recruiting Islamic extremists to fight against the Russian troops. As reported by Al-Mayadeen media network, an Arab satellite news channel,
Close to 450 extremist Arab and foreign nationals have arrived in Ukraine from Idlib to fight against Russia’s forces, less than only three days after they left Syria, passing through Turkey. Relatives of extremists that have arrived in Ukraine told Sputnik that senior fighters from terrorist group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (the rebranded version of Jabhat Al-Nusra, i.e Al-Qaeda) have held a number of meetings with senior leaders in the Turkistan Islamic Party group and Ansar Al-Tawhid and Hurras al-Din groups, and agreed on allowing a number of all their fighters to enter Ukraine through Turkish soil. The sources added that most of these foreign fighters are veterans of the Syrian war, had been causing issues in Idlib, and were given this opportunity to fight against Russia as a compromise by which they would receive a new start and with an acceptable income (Al Mayadeen).
Russia and Ukraine have the largest number of Christians in Europe. Today, 71 per cent of Russians and 78 per cent of Ukrainians identify as Orthodox Christians. The Eastern Orthodox Church is the world’s second largest Christian denomination, with approximately 220 million baptised members. As one of the oldest surviving religious institutions in the world, the Orthodox Church has played a prominent role in the history and culture of Eastern Europe. In Ukraine, the canonical Orthodox Church calls itself the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC). In May 1992, the heads of all Orthodox Churches, including Constantinople and the Greek Church, emphasised the recognition of UOC as “the only Church that was canonical and independent in its administration of the territory of the newly created state of Ukraine.”
The Zelensky regime continues cracking down on priests of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. He claims that these priests are secretly collaborating with Russia. “Kiev prefers to sign a pact with the Western left rather than fall victim to Moscow’s imperialism. That is why Ukrainian patriotism increasingly adopts rainbow colours and so do the Neo-Banderites,” writes Maciej Pieczyński, a Polish political scientist. “While in Russia,” Pieczyński continues, “propaganda of homosexuality is not allowed, in Ukraine the rainbow ideology is seeping even into the ranks of the army. Already in 2018, an NGO called LGBTIQ+ Soldiers was established on the Dnieper River to provide support for non-heterosexual soldiers.”
Security forces in Ukraine are now regularly carrying out raids of Orthodox churches and arresting their clerics on accusations of treason. Since February 2022, UOC churches have been stormed, closed and destroyed. At the same time, the mobs who organise violence in churches are protected by the Ukrainian authorities. The involvement of the Azov movement in these violent actions against the Orthodox priests is particularly disturbing. Azov adherents embrace Neo-Nazi imagery and practices. In an open letter dated April 12, 2023, and addressed to Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople, Sylvester, vicar of the Kiev Metropoly and rector of the Kiev Theological Academy and Seminary, commented that this violence against the Church is taking place with the direct participation of law enforcement authorities. According to him,
The right to freedom of conscience and religious beliefs is being openly violated in Ukraine. It is quite obvious since the end of 2022, the Ukrainian state has set a course for the gradual destruction of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church.
The Perchersk Lavra is a historic monastery and Ukraine’s most revered Orthodox site. It is located in the Ukrainian capital of Kiev. The monastery officially split from the Moscow patriarchate after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. In January 2023, however, the Ukrainian government issued an eviction notice to the over 1,000 monks occupying this monastery.
The process of evicting monks from the Lavra monastery began on March 30, 2023. Law enforcement agents conducted an extensive operation to deliver subpoenas to monks and seminary students on the premises of the monastery to appear for questioning. The UOC leader, Metropolitan Clement, said on the occasion that the Ukrainian government had no legal right to evict those monks from the church grounds, adding:
If the government forces us to do it illegally, it’s called totalitarianism. We don’t need such a state or government. We have the constitution and laws. We don’t accept other methods (Bachega).
According to Zelensky, the eviction of the monks from the Lavra monastery is a step towards strengthening the country’s independence. Ironically, the decision came soon after the UOC had officially decried Russia’s invasion, cutting off its connection with the Moscow patriarchate due to the military operation.
The UOC leadership has always insisted they are entirely loyal to Ukraine and have officially denounced the Russian invasion. On April 1, 2023, the Orthodox faithful gathered outside the monastery to protest against the eviction, including a third-year seminary student dressed in a priest’s robes who insisted the Lavra priests and residents were in no way pro-Russian:
Look at me, I’m in priest’s clothes, with a Ukrainian flag and a cross around my neck. Could you say that I’m pro-Russian? The priests are currently singing a Ukrainian hymn, and they’re being called pro-Russian. Can you believe it?
The abbot of the Lavra monastery, Metropolitan Pavel, now accused the Ukrainian Minister of Culture of being “possessed by anger, hatred, and diabolical rampage.” After making this comment he was arrested for “justifying Russian aggression.” The Metropolitan says the claim by the Security Service of Ukraine, known as SBU, that he condones Russia’s invasion, is false and politically driven. After a monitoring bracelet was placed around his ankle, Metropolitan Pavel stated: “I am accepting this. Christ was crucified on the cross, so why shouldn’t I accept this?”
This is the kind of anti-Christian persecution more commonly associated with Stalin’s Soviet Union. But one should not be surprised because the pro-West Zelensky regime is notoriously hostile to all forms of Christian morality. His government has legalised abortion, prostitution, the use of cannabis (weed), and gambling. Under Western influence, Ukraine has become an “outpost of globalism” and a “bastion of leftism.” According to French essayist and philosopher Lucien Cerise, “the main actors in this morality revolution are George Sorors’ Open Society Foundation, but also NATO, the armed wing of globalism, which also advocates ‘inclusive diversity’ and ‘open society.’”
To conclude, Zelensky has cancelled elections, promoted violence against Orthodox Christians, and extend his own term in office, thus effectively becoming a brutal dictator. In all this he has been cheered on by warmongering Western leaders and idolised by the Western media. Curiously enough, Zelensky had run as a peace candidate who promised the Ukrainians to bring peace to their nation. Instead, he appears to operate in “the spirit of the anti-Christ” by sowing discord between two white Christian nations. Accordingly, neither Zelensky nor the Western leaders who support his regime are truly prepared to make a peace agreement with the Russians, which leads one to question their real motivations and whether there might be a deliberate concern to push for an apocalyptic Third World War with Russia.
[Editorial Note: President Zelensky has signed a law that effectively bans the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC). This legislation, passed by the Ukrainian parliament on August 20, 2024, and signed into law on August 24, 2024, prohibits the activities of religious organizations declared to be affiliated with Russia, particularly targeting the UOC, which is the largest religious institution in Ukraine].
